SLAVES AND OWNERS
Written and directed by Quentin
Tarantino, Django is a blaxploitation-type western that plays like an
episode of Bonanza with lots of blood splattered.
It seems Tarantino set out to tell the story of how slavery really was, as a continuation of Alex Haley’s Roots. At least, that’s what he’s said in a recent interview.
Where
Haley’s Roots traces the genealogy of African-Americans, however,
Django traces how blacks were treated by whites and each other. Each
character in Django, which is set two years before the Civil War,
represents a type of person who existed then.
Stephen represents the
older slaves, who were in charge of all of the other slaves. Stephen has
a voice and uses it to treat the slaves worse than the master.
Calvin
represents the slave owners who have been raised around blacks and know
that there is a class difference, yet manage to treat them (read: black
women) as equals, at times.
Dr. Schultz represents the whites who were angrily against slavery, and tried to do something about it. Django
Unchained is a decent movie. It highlights the black experience and its
titular character is a black hero “killing whitey.” Jackson put it best
in an interview with The Urban Daily in which he described Django as
Shaft on horseback.”
UNACCEPTABLE
That said, there are some things that give one pause about Django. There
is an enormous amount of blood splatter – commonplace in a Tarantino
film. Moreover, none of the black actors in the film were recognized by
the Hollywood Foreign Press Association with nominations for a Golden
Globe.
Waltz and DiCaprio have been nominated for best supporting
actor, and Tarantino for best director and original screenplay. In the
directing and writing categories, it’s understandable that Tarantino has
been nominated. He’s a respected filmmaker. In addition, Waltz and
DiCaprio are respected actors in their own right.
Foxx and Jackson getting snubbed, however, is unacceptable. As Django, Oscar-winner
Foxx is the epitome of a man in love with and devoted to his wife, torn
between being fettered as a black man and having the freedom of a free
man. He has to watch his wife get brutalized over and over again and
not react.
Django even goes so far as to get on his hands and knees
and beg for Hildie to be spared. Needless to say, he is the type of man
that black men should model themselves after. Foxx’s Django is the
reason Django Unchained is a great movie: Django gives audiences a black
hero to look up to — which is nomination-worthy.
As Stephen, British
Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA) and Independent Spirit
award winner Jackson is the perfect villain. Stephen has the power of
life and death in his hands — so much power that whites as well as
blacks fear him — and wields quiet power over Calvin. Rather than use
that power for good, Stephen exacts severe punishments on his own
people. Stephen is the type of villain that audiences are expected to
hate, and
Jackson plays this villain well enough that he should have
received a nomination. DiCaprio, who is scary good at playing a
plantation owner who likes black women, plays the dandy quite well. He’s
also really good at being the type of man who likes to watch black
people brutalize each other.
Lastly, Waltz’s Dr. Schultz is
awesome. He never loses his cool, even when staring down two dozen
loaded guns, and is fiercely devoted to the freedom of all people, even
to his detriment.
Django Unchained is like Roots in that it’s
something that all black people (read: adults) should see. It tells the
story of one man’s journey from slave to husband/hero/free man.
It’s disconcerting, though, that the actors who embody a film geared toward the black experience are not honored as they deserve.